IN THE HON’BLE
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.
Supplementary
Affidavit
In
Support of
Civil
Misc. Writ Petition No.
of 2004
(Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
(District – Agra)
1. Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
Aundh, Pune – 411007
2. P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill
Society, Aundh, Pune - 411007 ,Founder President, Institute of Rewriting
Indian History, Aundh, Pune – 4110071-------------Petitioner
VERSUS
1. Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources
and Development (HRD),
Government of
India, New Delhi.
2. Secretary, Tourism and
Archeological Department, Govt. of India,
New Delhi
3. Director General,
Archaeological Survey of India,
Government of India, Janapath, New Delhi.---------Respondents
Affidavit of Pankaj
Kumar, Advocate, High Court
Aged about 26 years s/o Sri Lal Bahadur Singh
R/O. Village and Post
Azampur Via Noorpura
District Bijnor at Present
C/o Shri Yogesh Kumar Saxena Advocate High Court R/o H. I. G. 203 Preetam Nagar
Allahabad.
( DEPONENT)
I, the above named Deponent, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as
follows:
1.
That the
deponent is the active life member of the Institute of Rewriting Indian History
and has been authorised through its Founder President, P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri
Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune – 411007,
petitioner No. 2 of writ petition to file the affidavit in support of writ
petition and as such he is fully acquainted with the facts deposed to below.
2.
. That Sri
P.N. Oak was born on 2nd March 1917 at Indore and he fought the
battle of independence in association with Neta Ji Sri Subhash Chandra Bose and
thereafter conducted the research on the ancient Vedic Cultural Heritage in
India and also in different part of the World. He is now running at the age of
above 87 years and is suffering from ailments due to old age and as such
authorised the deponent to file this affidavit, which may kindly be accepted by
this Hon’ble Court.
3.
That the entire world is being
fool by the fundamentalist follower of the Mughal invaders by drawing the
attention of the tourist to the self exposure of the truth through falsehood,
which will be revealed to every conscience citizens by introspection’s of the
preaching given to the visitors by the self proclaimed guide of these
monuments. It is submitted that can there be two graves of Arjuman Bano, Mumtaj
Zilani and Shah Jahan on 3 – 4 floor of the building at two places at the same
time. There is also an interesting phenomena, which is hidden regarding the
existing monuments having the octagonal well for the supply of the water inside
the Red Stone building having the different idols, deities and the symbol of
worship of the Hindu religion , mysteriously covered with hypothetical
justification , which are concealed for visiting by the tourist even at the
cost of collapsing the monument of Taj Mahal . The similar structure providing
the coverage to the big building towards its right and left side have been
deflected to be to mosque and the replica on the other hand. Can there be the
existence of symbol like Swastik, OM, Lotus, Snake, Peacock, and Trident in
every carving out of the structure to the public. The coconut with mango leaf
put on the top of the pitcher is the symbol of worship copelled with these
identities. What is hidden inside the dome structure, which is never allowed to
be visited to its visitors. Can there be any octagonal building chosen by a
Muslim Ruler, which is a symbol of recognition of eight directions/ dimension
of the universe recognize by Hindu religion? Can any one may imagine it as the
truth that the Koranic scripts is carbed out on the tiles , which has been
pasted by removing the existing recital of Sanskrit Stanzas written by the
creator of the said temple. Can the Union of India pose any justification for
closing of the red stone building by placing the mud on the front side up to
plinth of marble construction? Can the Govt. of India may provide any
justification for closer of the doors of the two story building made out of the
red stone visual towards the back side of the Taj Monuments with the doors
permanently sealed through its imposture stone planted from out side for hiding
the truth regarding the actual authorship of this monuments of national
importance.
4.
That similarly at Agra Red Fort for
providing a true barrier upon the identity of the great monuments, the hidden
chamber inside the building below the structure shown to the public are
purposely concealed from the eyes of the visitors, which have the existence of
the Hindu tradition of construction of the palace by Hindu Ruler as their style
of living and for accumulation of the natural rainy water “Babali” but it has
been candestalinely concealed from the general public. The reason for
concealment of all these important historical evidence is on account of the
fact is that there are three caves leading to the different monuments of
Etmaudolla, Fatehpur Sikri and also to Taj Mahal. If these caves are allowed to
be seen by the public and the scientific investigation of the same may be
permitted to be done regarding the hidden chamber through scientific method, it
will be revealed that the existence eof Agra Red Fort was remain in existence
for more than 2,000 year before when great emperor Akbar and emperor Kanishka
have used these buildings as there palaces.
5.
That
Fatehpur Sikri is the great heritage of Hindu Sanskriti, in which starting from
Jain religion upto the period of emperor Ashoka there were many rulers using
this heritage city of Hindu culture and religious identity as there palace and
other religious monuments. However the under ground hidden chamber still
visualize to the public regarding their existence may be seen from out side but
surprisingly enough to submit that these hidden apartment and other idols and
deities recovered from village Kagarol at the nearby vicinity of Fatehpur Sikri
are not visualised by the Archaeological Survey of India till date. Can the
bast majority of Hindu religion may desperately be allowed to see the existence
all of these monuments having the fixture and identity resembling to the Hindu
religion to be supervise by the follower of the Muslim invaders under the garb
of having the alleged mosque inside all the three buildings and to get a
caumaflag of the Muslim pre-domination under the provisions of the Waqf Act
1995on the basis of diplomatic appeasement policy to the minority by the
Central Government? Or the majority of 85 % of the population has got their
right to become conversant regarding the truth hidden inside these buildings.
It is submitted that our children may not be thought the historical events with
the falsehood, which is based on false perceptions of the super domination of
such elements having the dis integration of the nation, which was visualize at
the time of partition of our country in two segmentation on the devise of the
British policy adopted by our present day politician to rule upon the nation.
Thus the petitioner is filing the present Supplementary. Affidavit for placing
certain other facts , which may provide strengthen to the relief sought in the
present writ petition and thereby the indulgence of this Hon’ble Court as these
monuments may be protected in respect of their two identity otherwise the hue and cry listen at present from the scream
of the future citizens having the prospective atrocities repeated by
fundamentalist aggressors invaders to
our great cultural heritage, may never forgive their curse to the present system having the
foundation of three institutions in our so called democratic set up in our
country
6.
That these
monuments are being neglected. The 150 year old Archaeological Survey of India
seems to have lost its direction and zeal to conserve the National treasures on
account of these scaffoldings committed by the interested parties having the
control of these so- called Mughal monuments under the provisions of Wakf Act,
1995 in Agra- Delhi circuit due to all kinds of malpractice. A long list of
charges against the mandarins in the Agra ASI would shock any one concerned
about preserving history and culture. The ASI’s pathetic goof- up in the Taj Heritage
Corridor is well known. But no heads rolled in the Archaeological
Survey of India for
failing to sound the alarm bell on the corridor project in time. The Archaeological
Survey of India mandarins
have acted according to their whims and fancies in the matter of restoration
work. Several important monuments including the Jami Masjid of Agra and the
tomb Rasul Shah near Fatehpur Sikri have been will fully neglected, though
these buildings are in need of immediate repairs. Archaeological Survey of
India’s official vandalism crossed all limits when a decision was taken to
treat the Taj Mahal with Multani Mitti. Luckily, the experiment was limited to
a small surface. Had it been applied to the whole mausoleum, it would have
destroyed the original transparent white polish (vajra lepa). The
Archaeological Survey of India has also been guilty of arbitrarily closing
monuments on the questionable ground of damage by tourists who did not
appreciate works of art and history. This is a clear violation of the1958Act,
which allows free movement to the public in any protected monument including
the white marble ancient buildings of Agra Fort.
7.
That the Distortion of history is another serious charge against the
Archaeological Survey of India in Agra. A structure bearing an inscription in
Persian and invocation to Allah was identified as Haveli Ratan Singh, which was
pompously opened to the world by the local Member of Parliament Sri Raj Babbar. The work on the socalled Ibadat
Khana in Fatehpur Sikri has to be suspended when historians raised several
questions about its veracity A voluminous petition by noted Agra historian
Prof. R. Nath to the Director General of, Archaeological Survey of India with
copies to the minister and the secretary of culture has highlighted the
Archaeological Survey of India lapses. A similar writ petition has also been
filed in the Supreme Court by Rajiv Sethi and others against the Archaeological
Survey of India for its poor conservation of the monuments of Red Fort Delhi.
8.
That the
objective hidden behind for filing the present writ petition is for exposure of
the truth after due investigation on the basis of the historical evidences,
which may protect the monuments namely Taj Mahal, Agra Red Fort and Fatehpur
Sikri from its detonation of the existing building. It is submitted that on
account of hiding the ground floor from the exposure to the public of all these
monuments, there has been the complete demolition of the of the existing
structures of all the three monuments. It has come to notice of the general
public through different media reports, that Taj Mahal and other monuments are
dying and there has been the tilting of the minerals and its foundation may be
sinking. The true copy of the report published in the different newspaper are
filed herewith and marked as Annexure
No. S.A.1 to this Affidavit.
9.
That
it has been revealed hat the Taj minarets are tilting @ .5 inches every 25
years. The tilt is in one of the front facing minarets is 8.5 inches. These
figures might not been much to the layman, but for a monuments of historical
importance like Taj Mahal, the foundation of which are laid on hillock and based
on wells underneath, which require moisture, fresh air and a regular
maintenance of the hidden chambers, these figures are alarming for providing
immediately attraction, for which the great historian Prof. (Sri) Ram Nath of
Rajasthan University and historian Sri Agram Prasad Mathur former Vice Chairman
of Agra University Agra have shown their concern.
10.
That
apart from this the foundation of Taj Mahal are made of ebony, which have
developed cracks even by sinking in to the earth. Thus if the lower chambers
hidden inside the earth from the front side of the alleged graveyard may not be
regularly maintained properly, even at the cost of revealing the truth of being
constructed prior to the Mughal period in 1155 AD, the threat to save the dome
and the other structure of the building could not be given effect.
11.
That apart from this it is
submitted that the petitioner no.2, Sri P.N. Oak has categorically asserted through his writing in the different
research work conducted by making the publication of the different books
published from time to time. That prior to the prorogation of the Islam is
religion and the Christianity, there was the vedic culture prevelant through
out the world. There was the destruction of Hindu temples and reconverting of
the same to the Muslim monuments, the valuable construction raised in the
pre-vedic era was abrogated and subjugated to the naught and the different
Sanskrit terms have been mispronounce carving out to the different languages of
Persian, English, German, and even the French language. Thus the conclusion in
escapable that as the peacock throne having many valuable gems, which was
captured upon the accession of emperor Shah Jahan, was taken Diamonds, Rich
Pearls and emeralds having the valuation of Rs. 20 Million was taken away by
these invaders. The true copy of the extract of the vedic culture in India
based upon the writing of Shri P. N. Oak is field herewith and marked as Annexure No. S.A. 2 to this
Affidavit.
12.
That
it has been revealed by monthly Journal namely Abhay Bharat published from
Delhi through its founder president Shri B. N. Sharma “ Prem Singh Sher”
ex-Member of Parliament. That thee has been the conversion of the prominent
temple in to the mosque the list of these temple converted as the Muslim
monuments was published in the monthly issue of Wednesday 15 th November to
14th December 2003. The true copy of the list of the temple distracted by
Mughal Invaders comprising of 634 temples and others Hindu Monuments are filed
herewith and marked as Annexure No.
S. A. 3 to this Affidavit.
13.
That
according to British Historian Keene Agra Red Fort has been in existence from
the pre Christian era. It has been revealed by historical evidence of the
writing of the different foreign historians published posthumously in India.
That the ancient Hindu King Great King
Ashoka ( Third century B.C.) and Great King Kanishka (first century B.C.) had lived in that fort. Thus the claim setup
by the mediable Muslim falterers, that Akbar built the Agra Red Fort is based
on falsehood. The lower portion of the building comprising of three caves
leading to the different monuments hidden inside the Agra Red Fort having the
connectivity there of to these national monuments, who claims to be the
protector of these ancient monuments of Archeological importance after
enactment of the Waqf Act 1995. The true copy of the Photographs showing the
lower construction hidden from being access by the general public is filed
herewith and marked as Annexure No.
S.A.4 to this Affidavit.
The
photographs of the pillar having the lotus carving and carving of the OM in the
flower pot and the Shiv Lingi shown there in having trident at Deewane-e
Khas at Agra Red Fort is filed herewith
and marked as Annexure No. S.A.5
to this Affidavit.
14.
That
the petitioner is further placing the photographs having the description
written by Archeological Survey of India on the marble stone planted outside
the Taj building, which has the vital contradictions, in itself indicating the
construction of Taj Mahal built during reign of emperor Shah Jahan from 1628 to 1656 AD, while Anjuman Bano the
niece of emperor Noor Jahan and the daughter of Mirza Gihas Beg admittedly died
on 17th June 1631, The true copy of the Photographs and writing
displayed on the marble plank out side the Taj building is filed herewith and
marked as Annexure No. S.A.6 to this Affidavit.
15.
The
petitioner also filing the writing displayed inside Taj Mahal building having
the purported Taj Mosque having the admission of gold plated Kalash measured 30 feet 6 inches replaced by
Captain Joseph Tailor in 1810, while the second replacement of very gold Kalash
in 1876 and the third replacement in 1940 is filed herewith and marked as Annexure No. S.A.7 to
this Affidavit.
The
petitioner is also filing the alleged claim purported to have been set up
through their own literature by Archeological Survey of India as Annexure No.S.A.8 to this
Affidavit.
16.
That the petitioner is making the
exposure of the falsehood on the basis of the photographs taken the closer
lances showing the writing of Koranic script upon the tiles by making the
grooves in the marble and having the imposture there upon after removal of the
original Sanskrit description comprising of 34 stanzas, which has been found
written upon the Bateshwar inscription and having the description there of in
the research work of conducted by Shri P.N. Oak through his writing namely The
Taj is a Temple Place on Page No. 198 having recital of 24,25 and 34 Stanzas
relevant for establishment. That Taj Mahal was built as temple of Lord Shiva,
while Atmauddola was having the ideal of Lord Vishnu, which were constructed by
the King Parmarde Dev or on his behalf by his Minister Salakshan in 1212 ,
Vikram era Ashwani Subday 5th day of Purnima (the bright luner fort night). The true copy
of the photographs of the files having Koranic script, the photographs from
back side showing the construction of the ground floor through Red Stone and the
marking of the Kalash on the terrace of the Red Stone building and the
description in Hindi placed outside the Taj Mahal as displaying the Script out
side these monuments after reshuffling of the main temple and the Sanskrit
writing on the temple, taken from the out side the building of Taj Mahal and the extract of writing shown by Sri P.N.
Oak having Sanskrit inscription on Bateswar inscription and the Script out side
the Mosque like appearance constructed on the fourth floor of the building of
the Taj Mahal are filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.S.A.9,10,11,12,13 to this Affidavit.
17. That On the other hand, it is
resplendent immortal tear drop of deception by converting the glorified palace
comprising of four storey building having a Shiva Temple on the top of
“Tejo-Mahalya” (a palace of Lord Shiva commonly known as Tejo Ji by Jat
predominating inhibition of ‘Taj Ganj’ area at Agra) on the cheek of time
(probably during Aurangzeb period which became the downfall of the Mughal
period). The Archeological Department alleges the construction of the building
from 1628 A. D. onward upto 1656 A. D. as displayed on the marble stone planted
outsides the gate of Taj Mahal.
18. That the other aspect of the
truth is hidden behind the four storey building of the Palace covered with the
mud comprising of the four garden towards the front side while towards the back
side adjoining to Yamuna river the lower portions of the building could not be
covered with the mud which demonstrate that the policy of ‘Hide and Seek’ has
been adopted to provide a coverage of the period of actual construction of the
building of Taj Mahal from the entire world. Inside the palace there is the
stone carving of the religious deity and an octagonal well for supply of the
water in the under ground rooms numbering from 44 rooms at the bottom while 17
rooms situated under the Chameli-Farsh on the riverside.
19. That the petitioner is also filing the
inscription having Koranic script leveled upon it for indicating the same to be
the Muslim monuments. He is also filing the hidden portion of Anoop Mahal
having so many construction leading to the underground building of Fatehpur
Sikri , which is not shown to the public by filling the water on the entrance
Gate by the Waqf Board, which is now converting every symbol of Hindu origin by
having a plaster upon the aforesaid historical evidences. He is also filing the
Snake like appearance having the appearance of “Shesh Nag”, which is said to
have the entire Gate of the earth upon its hoods according to the Hindu Vedic
scripture. Had there been the construction of these monuments by the Mughal
Emperor, they would have never created such type of the Hindu Religions
identity inside these monuments. The true copy of the photographs of
imposter Koranic Script on Buland
Darwaza, Terrace of Anoop Mahal having so many construction leading to the
underground building, Snake like appearance having the appearance of “Shesh Nag
of Fatehpur Sikri indicating the aforesaid exposure of the truth for displaying
them in the present writ petition as a facts finding committee to revealed the
truth and to protect the monuments may be appointed by this Hon’ble Court, are
file herewith and marked as Annexure
No. S.A. 14, 15 ,16 to this Affidavit.
20. That the stairways now closed and
shut down cleverly with the stone slabs by the custodian of the building namely
the walk Board after promulgation of walk Act 1995, further provides the
coverage to the deceptiveness of falsehood. It is curious to note that the
arches on the riverside have been closed up with rough brick-masonry which has
been eased exteriorly- towards the Yamuna river with red stone slabs bearing
carved designs. This masonry which is still going on inspite of the restriction
imposed under the Ancient Monument and Archeological sites and Remains Act,
1958 and the Ancient and Historical Monument and Archeological sites and
Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act 1951.
21. That the basement, which is
comprising of the Red Stone has been converted by deleting the sign of Hindu
construction of the building. Shah Jahan died in Agra Fort in captivity in the
early hours of the night of Monday, the 26th Rajab A. H. 1076/1666
A. D. Jahanara, daughter of Mumtaj Mahal was also living with Shah Jahan after
the death of Arjumand Bano Begum. On his death R’ an Andaaz Khan, the commander
of Fort, Khurajah Phul came into Ghusal-Khanah where Sayyed Mohammad Kannauji
and Qaji Kurban, chief Qaji of Agra were called upon. At Muthamman Burj where
Emperor Shah Jahan had died. His body was transported by boat through Darwaja
Nashab of the Muthamman Burj and the outer Sher Haji Gate, which are now closed
for the public.
22. That, the claim set-up by the
Archeological Department that Taj Mahal was started during the regime in1628
and completed in 1656, when Shah Jahan was alive is a falsehood. The Tombstone
are not monolithic, but are composed of exquisitely dressed with marble slabs
of different sizes. The symbolic Motifs like Swastika, Cakra, Satkona
(hexagon), panchkona (pantagon), Sankh (wnch-shell) in the reverse order moving
anti-clock wise are found in every Mugal monuments situated at Delhi, Agra,
Fatehpur Sikri, Humayun’s Tomb, Akbari-Mahal, Jahangiri Mahal and at the Moti
Majid of Agra Fort and Janis Masjid of Fatehpur Sikri and at Akbari-Tomb
(Sikandra, Agra) are the symbol of Hindu worship. The octagonal basement is the
reciprocator of ten directions which is known only under Hindu Traditions
includes Earth and the sky apart from eight directions while the other
religions namely Christianity and Mugal consider only four directions. The
animate motifs like peacocks, fishes are worshipped by the Hindu the
geometrical element like triangle, square, rectangle found at Taj Mahal and also
at Fatehpur Sikri and Moti Masjid of Agra are the symbols of Hindu Traditional
used during the Hindu festival at the entrance of the Home side. Satkona and
other weapons namely Ankush (elephant goad), trishul (trident), Bana (arrow),
parasu (mini-axe) are seen in the large number of their variations which may be
seen ad masons marks at Taj Mahal and Fatehpur Sikri.
23. That on the other hand ,the only
imposter made by the invaders during Mugal period are the fixation of the
Koranic Script out side these monuments after reshuffling of the main temple
and the Sanskrit writing on the temple, the description of which is found in
“BATESWAR INSCRIPTION” now preserved in side
the Lucknow Museum revealing the date of construction of Hindu temple by
Raja Paramdardi Dev, a Jat Ruler in 1155-1158, while the palace remain in
existence even prior to such period, may be seen by the close scrutiny of the
tiles planted on the main and side gates of the temple.
24. That the common symbols found at Fatehpur
Sikri, constructional technique of all these building in one category which are
commonly represented as Hindu religious symbols building. The letter of the
Director General of Archeological Survey of India, New Delhi Bearing D. O.
letter number 54/16/73-M dated 22nd /24th May 1973 to Dr.
R. Nath, Professor of History Department and Historical research Documentation
Programme, Jaipur acknowledge the truth. It is alarming that although the voice
of the great historical was raised before the pavement stones of the main
plinth of tomb of Humayun was replaced by orthodox Muslims, the preservation of
the mason’s mark by the circle superintending archeologists of the different
regions would not be maintained despite assurance given by then Director General
M. L. Desh Pande in reply to the letter written by Prof. R. Nath on 15th
May 1973,.
25. That it has been revealed to the
general public on the basis of the investigation conducted by the Senior Editor
of Amar Ujala, Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh, S/O Jagdish Prasad Verma, R/O MIG
1A-107, Shastri Puram, Sikandara, Bodhala Road, Agra, that there has been the
significant number of the facts and also on the basis of the evidence collected
that there are two floor red stone building below the white marble construction
of Taj Mahal. On the ground floor, there were toilets for the use of residents
of the Royal palace while the living
apartment are situated on the first floor. There are octagonal buildings
submerged inside the great historical monument which has been purported to be
the graveyard inside the middle of the white stone building while towards the
left side there is the mosque and on the right side the replica of the same as
alleged by the fundamentalists, individualists, supported by the protective appeasement
policy by enactment by the Wakf Act, 1995. The petitioner is also filing the
news Item published on 9/7/2003in “Amar
Ujala” on the basis of investigation conducted at Taj Mahal for foundation of
claim set up through their own showing duly accepted by Archeological Survey of
India as Annexure No.S.A.17
to this Affidavit.
26. That it has been further revealed
that the doors affixed towards Yamuna side were found for being carved out from
the wooden material, which were found to be aged about more than 800 years at
Brookline University, through carbon dating test conducted in America and as
such these doors have been mysteriously disappeared by the interested parties
under the garb of maintenance of building
under the provision of Wakf Act,1995.
There are more than ten chambers of the ground floor, which have been
sealed while twenty two chambers were hidden inside the red stone building, for
which, there is description in
Moinnudeen Book “The Taj and its Environments”. The petitioner is also filing
the news Item dated 20/7/2003published in “Amar Ujala” on the basis of
investigation conducted at Taj Mahal for foundation of claim set up through
their own showing duly accepted by Archeological Survey of India as Annexure No.S.A.18 to this Affidavit.
27. That similarly there are number of the
remains of the deities/temples like structures lying there in Fatehpur Sikri,
which signifies the construction of the temple from more than two thousand
years before. The discovery of “Yakchh
Idol” fragmented deity comprising of significant sculptures work and a Shiva-
Linga of 3.5 feet height and a deity of the Vishnu have been recovered from the
adjoining areas of Fatehpur Sikri. There has been the demand of the people to
declare Fatehpur Sikri as an Ancestor Heritage City, which remained in
existence even prior to the period of before arrival of Christianity, when Lord Mahavira’s Jain religion was in
existence. The first Jain pilgrimage of
Rishi Bhagdev statue was recovered having the description of “Om, Samvat 1079
Jaishth Sudi 11 Ravi Swaty Nakshatray” , The transcription of “Sri Vimlacharya
samtane suplok cha dhanpatti tambhya karya titti” has been discovered written
upon the same. This signifies that in 1022 AD Din (Day) Swaty Nakshatray- Sri
Sambhaw Nath IIIrd Jain pilgrimage statue was constructed by the son of Sri Vimlacharya namely Pawan Srawak Devraj
and his wife Dhanpatti. These idols are hidden inside the earth in Sikri
village, while on the top hillside of Fatehpur Sikri, there are the existence
of the temple of Lord Shiva, Lord Vishnu and Maa Durga which are still hidden
inside the earth. This is still a secret,
that who have committed this scaffolding in order to provide the
extinction of Vedic literature from the access of the people. The petitioner is
also filing the news Item published on 2/4/1999, 15/6/1999,3/2/2000,15/1/2000,
29/1/2003 and 8/3/2003 in “Amar Ujala” on the basis of investigation conducted
at Fateh Pur Sikiri for foundation of claim set up through their own showing duly
accepted by Archeological Survey of India as Annexure No.S.A.1 ( Collectively) to this Affidavit.
3618
No comments:
Post a Comment