Ms.
Leona has narrated how Hindu (or non-Muslim) girls are trapped and
deceived into love by Muslim boys by keeping them in the dark about the
real face of Islam, which most often leads to a tragic end of the
marriage. It is only after the girl’s love has grown too deep or the
marriage that he starts imposing Islamic restrictions on her turning her
life miserable. The root cause of such disasters is the well-meaning
non-Muslim girl’s ignorance about Islam. Most Hindu girls consider Islam
as just another religion like Hinduism, and hence becomes easy pray of
cunning Muslim guys. In many cases, Muslim boys initially suppress their
Muslim identity and pretend to be a Hindu by adopting Hindu names.
As a matter of fact, Muslims born and
living in a non-Muslim-majority country never consider it as their own
country or motherland. In their eyes, it is simply a dar-ul-harb
or a land that must be conquered for Islam. Ideal Muslims consider it
as the land of Allah occupied by the non-Muslim enemy, and that they
must wage jihad for conquest. According to this Islamic psyche, Muslims
living in India do no consider India as their motherland but a
dar-ul-harb that must be turned into a dar-ul-Islam. So long this cannot be done, every Muslim should cause harm to India by whatever means they can.
Most importantly, seducing a Hindu girl
for raping or to marrying her is also a part of Islamic jihad. It is now
well known that Muslims all over the world are planning to conquer the
world by demographic aggression, and for this demographic war, wombs of
Muslim women are the most important weapon. So to seduce a Hindu girl,
convert her to Islam and marry her, or in other words, to convert a
Hindu womb into a Muslim womb, is of vital importance. Muslims in the
southern Indian state of Kerala have adopted this strategy, and set up a
well-planned program, called “Love Jihad”.
The Constitution of India gives adults
freedom to choose his/her life partner. So, if a Hindu girl, after
attaining the age of 18, marries a Muslim boy aged above 21, the law
cannot impede the marriage. It is seen that in most of the
inter-religious marriages, the boy is a Muslim and the girl is a Hindu.
In some cases, Muslim girls are also seen to marry Hindu boys, but such
instances are rare. However, one should not blame the Hindu girl for
selecting a Muslim boy as her life partner either, as they are, from her
childhood, awfully misguided by the Hindu religious teachers. These
religious teachers, most of whom know little about Islam, mislead the
Hindus by their teachings that all regions are the same, and one can
obtain God by following any religion. Above all, Sri Ramkrishna is said
to have told, jato mat tata path (or as many religions, there
are as many different ways to obtain God). So, after learning all such
false lessons, if a Hindu girl marries a Muslim boy, she must not be
blamed. But, real guilty are the Hindu religious gurus who propagate
entirely erroneous views about Semitic religions like Christianity and
Islam.
Stupidity of Hindu Religious Gurus
In this context, let me draw attention to a booklet, titled “Mahatma Mohammad O Tar Upadesh”
(Mohammad the Great and his Teachings), written by Swami Abhedananda
(published by Sri Ramakrishna Vedanta Math, Kolkata). Perusal of it
makes the reader convinced that Islam, as a religion, is far superior to
Hindu Dharma, and Mohammad was superior to Vedic seers like Vashistha,
Vishwamitra and so on. The author in that booklet writes that, even from
his childhood, Mohammad was an extraordinarily spiritual man and used
to meditate and attain the state of trance very often. He used to attain
that profound state of absorption (Samadhi) and experience transcendental vision even when he went out to graze animals.
But in fact, Mohammad was a man of
pastoral and nomadic Arab society and how (and the author has not thrown
any light on that) with this background, he could have been able to
raise himself to such a spiritual height? It is baffling that a person
like Swami Abhedananda could have written all these baseless rubbish and
pure lies.
But the author has consciously avoided
penning a single word to describe what Mohammad did after migrating to
Medina. The author has not mentioned how such spiritual Mohammad could
have been so nonspiritual to marry 6-year-old child Aisha at the age of
52. The author did not explain how spiritual Mohammad could have married
Zainab, the wife of his adopted son Zeid, when he was 56 and Zainab was
30. The author did not care to mention how spiritual Mohammad could
massacre the entire male-population of the Koreiza clan of Medina in 627
AD. Eight hundred males were butchered within a day, while etheir women
and children, about 1000 in number, were enslaved and sold, while the
young Koreiza women were distributed among the Prophet and his
associates for keeping as sex-slaves. And Mohammad, the spiritual man of
Swami Abhedananda, took for himself the most beautiful of them, named
Rihana, and raped her on the same night her male relatives, including
her husband, were slain in front of her. He did not explain how a
spiritual man could have committed such a bloody massacre and exhibit
such sensuality.
Readers will recall that a few years
ago, the birth centenary of Dr Mahanambrata Brahmachari, a renowned
exponent of Hindu Theology, was celebrated with much enthusiasm. This
learned man, in one of his writings, wrote without any context that
ISLAM is the abbreviation of the sentence I SHALL LOVE ALL MEN. The
author did not mention wherefrom he has collected this very important
piece of misinformation. In fact, Islam has no headache for loving
entire humanity. Islamic love and humanity is strictly confined only
among Muslims. Islam, in fact, divides the humanity into two groups, (1)
Muslims or Momens, and (2) non-Muslims or Kafirs, without a grey area.
According to Islamic theology, Islam is the only true religion on earth,
and those, who follow false religions, are wrong-doers and condemned
people. In the eyes of Allah, these kafirs are no better than animals,
and hence Allah has commanded Muslims to mount any kind of torture and
atrocities on them, kill them, burn them and their houses, take their
women and children as captives and rape their women, smash their
children on the floor and so on, which is collectively known as jihad.
So the Koran says:
- “We have created, for hell, many genii (races) of men, ….and they are like brute beasts” (7.179)
- “Verily, those who disbelieve our signs, we will surely cast them to
be broiled in the hell-fire, so often as their skins shall be well
burnt, We will give them new skins in exchange, so that they may taste
the sharper torment” (4.56)
- “Whosoever followeth any religion other than Islam, it shall not be
accepted of him in this life, and in the next life he shall be of those
who perish” (3.85)
- “I will cast a dread into the hearts of the unbelievers” (8.12)
- “Therefore cut off their heads, and strike off all the ends of the
fingers. This shall they suffer because they have opposed Allah and His
Prophet, and whosoever shall oppose Allah and His Prophet, verily Allah
will be severe in punishing them” (8.13)
- “…moreover, as for the nonbelievers, I will punish them with
grievous punishments in this world, and in the world is to come” (3.56)
- “Allah loves not the unbelievers” (3.57)
- “…they shall suffer a grievous punishment” (3.77).
The question naturally arises: what
inspired Dr Mahanambrata to write all these lies, all such baseless
rubbish. Mahanambrata would never know how many Hindu girls, influenced
by his false portrayal of Islam, would marry Muslim boys and suffered
hellish torment?
Baba Loknath has become very popular
today in Bengal. One finds a Loknath Baba Ashram at every locality in
the city of Kolkata. One must have also noticed that the reason for his
extraordinary popularity lies in his assurance that “If any one
remembers him in distress, anywhere like in a forest, in deep waters or
in a battlefield, Baba Loknath would provide protection for him”.
Hindu cowards and fools believe that the Baba would really protect them
in distress. But they are not rational enough to think that, if the Baba
has really such miraculous power to play saviour for the people in
distress, then why he is not showing any interest to save the Hindus in
Bangladesh, who are victims of bloody persecution by Muslims?
However, the devotees of Baba Loknath
have made a movie where it is seen that the Baba, with the help of his
extraordinary yogic power, goes to visit Mecca (his mundane body stay
lying like a dead at his ashrama and his shuttle body goes to Mecca). In
Mecca, the Baba puts up in the house of a Mullah and tells him that he
would receive Koran from him and give him Purana in exchange, as if
Koran and Purana are same.
After returning back to his Ashram, he
says that he has seen three perfect Brahmins (Bipras) in his entire life
and that Mullah of Mecca was one of them. It is to be mentioned here
that, to every Muslim, whether he is a religious Mullah or an ordinary
family-man, considers jihad as the highest form of worship of Allah.
Every Muslim theoretically believes that, if he can kill at least one
kafir, Allah will reward him heavily on the Day of Judgment (Qiamah). If
he succeeded in killing and got killed in the process, he will be a
martyr, and land in Allah’s paradise right away; if he kills a kafir but
remains alive, Allah will honour him with the honorable title of Ghazi
(slayer of infidel) and will receive rich rewards after death. Do the
devotees of Baba Loknath have ever thought how many Hindu girls have
been misguided to marry Muslims by his misinformation that Koran and
Puran are equal and the false exposition of an extremely communal Mullah
of Mecca as a noble hearted Brahmin?
Perhaps it is known to the Hindus of
Bengal that in the wake of Partition of India, Thakur Anukul Chandra,
being driven out by Muslims of his native place in the District of
Pabna, East Pakistan, came to India and settled at Deoghar in Bihar. But
after coming to India, the Great Anukul Chandra wrote,
Buddha ishar bibedh karis, Chaitanya Rasul Krishne /
Jiboddhare hon abirbhab, ek-i ora tao janisne //
(O, you fool. You
are trying to bring difference among Buddha, Christ, Sri Chaitanya,
Rasul Mohammad and Lord Sri Krishna? Don’t you know that there lies no
difference among them and they come down to earth only to save the
creation whenever they feel it necessary?)
So, according to Anukul Chandra, Christ, Mohammad, Buddha, Chaitanya and Lord Sri Krishna, all are equal. He also wrote:
Krishna rasul jisu adi nararupi bhagaban /
umi je tader murta pratik prerita bartaman //
(Lord Krishna,
Prophet Mohammad, Jesus Christ, all are gods in human attire. You are
also a replica of them and have been called for at present for a
purpose.)
So, in above verses, Anukul Chandra has
equated Lord Krishna to Mohammad, the prophet of Islam. All these verses
and other writings of the Hindu religious leaders that carry extreme
misinformation are sufficient to misguide Hindu girls to take wrong
decision like marrying Muslims. Hence, we cannot blame Hindu girls if
she, being misguided by such verses, marry Muslim boys and thus get into
hellish married life.
Truth about “Jato Mat Tato Path” mantra
“Jato mat tato path is a great
saying of Sri Ramkrishna. A preliminary enquiry is sufficient to
realize that Shri Ramkrishna had said these words only to mean that
various cults of Hindu Dharma, e.g. Vaishnav, Shaakta, Shaiva,
Gaanapatya etc. are same and anyone is capable of obtaining Moksha by
following anyone of them. It was Sri Mahendra Gupta (Mastermosai), who,
due to his limited knowledge, mistakenly brought the Semitic religions
in the fold.
Sri Mahendra Gupta elaborated “jato mat tata path” to
included Semitic religions, without knowing what the teachings of those
Semitic religions are, and wrote: Hindus, Muslims and Christians drink
water from a common pond, but Hindus call it jal, Muslims call it pani and Christians call it water.
The tragedy lies in the fact that, Mahendra Gupta has left the world a
long ago. But Hindus are paying the price for his misinterpretation.
In addition to that, we have the
contributions of the nonviolent saint of Gujarat. He used to sing
“Ishwar Allah tere naam”, as Allah is Ishwar. Most Hindus do not know
that Allah of Islam and the Ishwar of Hinduism are vastly different. A
careful perusal of the Koran reveals that Allah is nothing but a leader
of a criminal gang, a cruel killer. To highlight this point, Swami
Dayananda Saraswati in his Satyartha Prakash writes: “If the God of the
Quran had been the protector of all creatures and dispenser of
forgiveness and mercy to all, He would not have commanded the Muslims to
kill the people of other religions”. He also said, due to this reason,
“The Quran does not appear to have been made by God”.
That nonviolent prophet of Gujarat used
to read from the Koran and Gita in his prayer meetings (probably knowing
meanings of Koranic verses), and thus had set the misinformation that
the Koran is as good as Gita. It is very likely that Priyanka Todi,
being misguided by these faulty as well as dangerous interpretations,
has decided to marry Rizwanur Rehman and now she is paying the price.
A Hindu Girl Must think twice before marrying a Muslim
When a Hindu girl marries a Muslim, it
is implied that she must have to embrace Islam. Otherwise, the Muslim
community would not endorse the marriage. When Indira, daughter of
Jawanarlal Nehru, fell in love with the Muslim boy Firoz Khan, the son
Nawab Khan, a liquor dealer, both Firoz and Indira were secretly flown
to London, where Indira was converted to Islam in a mosque, name changed
to Farzanabibi, and thereafter their marriage was solemnized according
to Islamic rites. But after Rajib Gandhi was born, Firoz brought home
another woman. So a Hindu girl, when marries a Muslim boy, the net
result is that the Hindu society loses one member and at the same time
the Muslim society gains one. To describe this loss, Swami Vivekananda
has said, when a Hindu goes to another religion, it is not only one
number less, but one enemy more.
The matter is not so simple when a Hindu
girl enters into the Muslim fold through marriage. The number of
children, who will be born out of that wedlock, would also be Muslims
and hence the loss is much greater. Even Gandhiji could not allow the
defection of an individual from the Hindu fold. When his eldest son
Hiralal converted to Islam, he reconverted him to Hinduism with the help
of the Arya Samaj.
When a Hindu girl marries a Muslim boy,
it becomes difficult for her, in most cases, to adjust herself in the
Muslim family. She finds it difficult to eat beef, to wear burqa, to
live under a constant threat of oral divorce (or triple talaq), and most
importantly, to marry an unknown man and sleep with him at least for a
night to get back her husband, if her husband, on the point of rage,
divorces her with triple talaq. In addition to that, she may also find
her husband to bring other wives (as Islam permits a man to marry four
wives at a time) and is forced to adjust with her co-wives under
coercion and torture. (For example, when Firoz Khan brought home another
wife after Rajib’s birth, Indira came to her father’s house in tears.)
She might also fall victim of sexual
abuse by her near relatives, especially by her father-in-law. In Muslim
society, when a father-in-law rapes his daughter-in-law, Muslim clerics
refuse to accept it as a crime, because Mohammad had married his
daughter-in-law Zeinab, as mentioned above. According to Sharia Law, if a
woman brings the allegation of rape, she must also produce four male
witnesses in her support, otherwise she would be treated guilty of
adultery that calls for rajam (or stoning to death) as punishment. It is
needless to say that it is an impossible task for a woman to bring four
male witnesses to prove her allegation. Hence, in most of the cases,
there remains nothing for the victim but to keep silence and let the
oppressor go scot-free. In Muslim society, every adult male is more or
less lecherous, and possess an inherent desire for Hindu women. And
hence when a Hindu girl enters a Muslim household, she runs a much
greater risk of falling victim of rape by her close kin. Due to too many
such reasons, in about 95 per cent cases, the Hindu girls find no other
alternative but to return to her father’s house after horrible
experience.
So, it can safely be said that Hindu
girls, most of whom do not know the abc of Islam, marry Muslims under
temporary illusion, and later finds it nearly impossible to adjust her
with Muslim life-style. It also becomes difficult for her to seek
divorce, as Muslim clerics do not treat a prayer for divorce legal if it
comes from the woman. Hindu girls, therefore, must think twice before
marrying Muslim boys.
