Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters
of the Koran.
1. That the age of the original stone of
the Taj Mahal and the age of the Koran scrawled-stone are certainly different
and which could be ascertain scientifically. No where is there even the
slightest or remotest elusion in that Islamic overwriting stating Shahjahan’s
authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder of Taj Mahal, naturally
some words would have been scrawled there. When koranic lettering has been
forged on the walls of Taj Mahal, then why not the name of Mumtaz in whose
memory it was stated to be built.
2. That it is mentioned by the
inscriber, Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription on the building that
Shahjahan, far from building the marvel Tej, only disfigured it with black
lettering. A clue to that tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217,
Vol. IV of Archaeological Survey of India Reports, published in 1874, stating
that a .“great square black basaltic pillar which, with the base and capital of
another similar………..now in the grounds of the Museum at Agra……………….it is well
known, one stood in the garden of Taj Mahal.” The true copy of the photographs
deplicting the different monument with tempered representation having deceptive
indintity proclaiming as Mughal constriction as exhibited in the photographs
are Annexure no.18
3. That there was also a Sanskrit
inscription dated 1155 A. D. in the Taj Mahal which speaks conclusively that it
was a Hindu Temple, which was subsequently wrongly termed as Bateshwar
inscription, now preserved at the top floor of the Lucknow Museum.
4. That despite such staggering
evidence the respondent authorities have been guilty of Tomin the Taj Mahal as
a marble creation of Shahjahan and thereby creating and misleading the world
for over a century. All of them have also been making illegal gains through
their deceitful activities by being paid huge sums for their books, articles,
news reports, broadcasts, and telecasts.
5. That Archaeological Survey of
India is guilty of charging high entrance fee from thousands of visitors every
day from all over the world for over a century purveying through its licensed
guides concocted details about Shahjahan’s take authorship of the Taj Mahal and
through Archaeological Survey of India notices in Hindi, Urdu and English on
three stone plaques displayed at the Tajmahal entrance declaring that Shahjahan
raised the monument from 1631 to 1653 A. D.
6. That the authorities are guilty of giving
mis-information and dis-information all over the world for over a century. The
enormity of that academic crime affecting the whole world has caused a deep
injury and prejudice to the human population of the world. The national motto
of our country is “Satyameva Jayate“ (Truth alone triumphs). That In that
context the blatant lie that the Archaeological Survey of India has been
propagating to the entire academic and tourist world is a matter of national
sham and a serious concern to all.
7. That there is no valid reason why
Anglo-Invader school should not be able to produce even a single document
pertaining to the Invader claims to the fort. Had the claims been true such
documents should have been available in plenty because when the British deposed
the Mogul emperor they preserved and carefully classified all the documents
they seized form the mogul archives. Those records contain hardly anything but
letters. That when the Anglo-Invader school is unable to produce even a single
document in support of its claim any law court would draw an a priori adverse
inference.
8. That even then we claim no special
advantage form this fundamental weakness in the case of the respondent
Anglo-Invader school. In ordinary life, there are very many occasions when
documents are not available on either side and yet there is overwhelming
circumstantial evidence on the basis of which the court can come to a clear
judgement over the rival claims. It is such circumstantial evidence which we
propose to lay before the bar and bench of learned public opinion:
9.
That according to the British historian
Keene, Agra fort has been in existence from the pre-Christian era. Ancient
Hindu kings like Ashok (3rd Century B.C.) and Kanishka (1st
Century B.C.) had lived in that fort. That same fort is again referred to by
the Persian poet-historian Salman, in the 11th century A.D.. Early
in that century when the Hindu king Jaipal ruled over Agra. The fort suffered
its first Invader raid under the invader Mahmud of Ghazni.Thereafter some
chauvinistic Islamic accounts vaguely claim that the Invader sultan Sikandar
Lodi demolished the Hindu fort. That claim has been found to be baseless. A few
years later another vague claim is made by some other mediaeval Invader
faltterers that sultan Salim Shah Sur either destroyed the Hindu fort or
Sikandar Lodi’s fort and built his own fort at exactly the same place or some
other place. Even the claim has been found to be fraudulent because no trace is
found of the fort that Salim Shah Suri is said to have built. Invader history
is replete with such fraudulent claims, according to the late British historian
Sir H.M. Elliot.
10.
That an English visitor, Peter Mundy
who was in India only for about a year after Mumtaz’s death mentions the Taj
Mahal as one of the most spectacular buildings. Thus Shahjahan’s sacrilege of
the Hindu Taj temple-palace by misusing it as an Islamic graveyard ought to be
rectified by removing Arjumand Banu’s remains,if they really are in the Taj
Mahal, to her original grave, still
existing in Burhanpur. The garden pavilion of an Hindu mansion in
Burhanpur (about 600 miles south west of Agra) where Mumtaz was buried in 1631
A.D. after her death in her 14th delivery during 18 years of married
life. Shahjahan Mumtaz had encamped in the adjoining Hindu palace during a
north south journey when Mumtaz died.
11.
That
the ground plan of the orthodox Vedic octagonal Tejomahalaya shrine in Agra
where Mumtaz’s exhumed body is supposed to have been interred again. Why this
sacrilege? An aerial view. The white marble Tejomahalaya framed by four towers
at its plinth-corners on the south bank of the sacred Yamuna river. Two
identical red stone buildings (each with three marble domes) facing the marble
edifice from the east and west were meant to be reception pavilions for royal
or religious congregations. The central marble building and the flanking red
stone buildings are all seven storied with octagonal features, which is a Vedic
specialty. Seven storied octagonal buildings are mentioned even in Ramayanic
description of Ayodhya. A meticulous count will reveal 33 arches in the marble
plinth seen in front in between the two towers on the left and the right. Since
the marble platform is a square the breadth too has 33 arches consequently the
marble plinth itself encloses 33x 33=1089 rooms That is the ground floor. Above
it on either side of the lofty entrance arch may be seen vaulted arches on two
levels one above the other, which constitutes two more stories in marble.
12.
That
the outer western gateway leading to the spacious parking area for visitors’
vehicles lined by arcaded red stone verandahs with rooms for shopkeepers
selling their wares. The entire parking area is lined by such shopping arcades
which Tavernier describes as bazar of six courts. The western gateway has
assumed importance in modern times because the main bus depot and railway
stations of the populace, bustling Agra city lies in that direction. In olden
days it was the elevated gateway at the left which used, to be the main
entrance of the Tajganj alias Tajganj township. The Tejomahalaya shopping
arcade has had at its outer eastern and western corners, flanking the Shree
gate, two other subsidiary sentinel-temples. This octagonal pavilion with a white
dome in the southwest corner bearing the inverted lotus cap and straight Vedic
pinnacle pitcher shaft is one of them. But alas, since Shahjahan’s time the
sacred sanctum has an Islamic cenotaph attributed to an harem-maid Satunnisa
Khanam. But since no name is inscribed on it that seems to be an inspired
canard explaining away the desecration of the Hindu shrine.
13.
That the interior of the multi-storied
vaulted entrance gate leading first to the rectangular garden and then to the
wonder marble edifice at the far end. The temple palace management staff used
to work on both floors on various assigned duties. The carved decorative red
stone bunting around the interior and exterior of this gateway, about knee-high
from the floor, if minutely observed turns out to be an ingenious running chain
of three-in-one Ganesh images, two in profile on the flanks and one with a
frontal facing in the middle. The marble Taj Mahal has identical vaulted lofty
archways in all the four directions. Their temple décor was chiseled away and
Koranic extracts were improvised to fill the cavities. Close look at the marble
stone frames around the vertical and horizontal Koranic passages to notice the
patches of dissimilar shapes and tints of marble used. Cobras lined up above a
string of inlaid temple bells pattern form the upper border of the Taj Mahal.
Both cobras and bells have sacred associations in Vedic spiritual lore.
14.
That the gateway at which entry tickets are
issued, is decorated both inside and out, at the knee level with a bunting
depicting such ingeneous three-in-one Ganesh caricatures; two in profile on the
flanks enclosing a frontal one in the middle. The arches in the marble plinth
and the rectangular ventilator above each one of them,(allowing light and air
to the 1089 chambers inside the plinth)may be minutely observed to have been
sealed with marble slabs.
15.
That the seven arches at the bottom enclose
the stairs, which lead to the top of the marble plinth symmetrically from the
right and left. The Nandi (Lord Shiva ‘s Bull) occupied the spot where the
person clad in white robes is seen standing facing the entrance, before it was
uprooted at Shahjahan’s orders. That spot was patched up later with inferior
reddish slabs. There is trident shaped designs in inlay filigree at the two
upper corners of the entrance and the trident shaped red lotus bud at the apex
of the arch.
16.
That the Koranic stones fixed vertically and
horizontally along such lofty arches on all four sides were improvised to fill
up gaping cavities left after digging out idols of Vedic deities and Sanskrit
extracts. We arrive at the above conclusion because (1) a close inspection of
the marble frames enclosing the Koranic extracts reveal patches of marble of
different shapes and tints (2) The Koranic extracts are random, haphazard out
of sequence and incomplete (3) On hot days with the visitor’s feet burning on
the marble plinth a fierce sun beating down on the head and the eyes burning
with intense sunlight radiated by the white marble sheen even a devout Invader
knowing Arabic won’t have the heart or even the steady head or patience to
crane and strain his eyes and neck alternately vertically and horizontally to
make any head or tail of that message of Allah. A close-up of the upper part of
a minaret. The galleries rest on snake-shape brackets, which is a distinct
Hindu architectural trait. Mumtaz’s tomb in the crypt (basement). The pavement
patched up with marble slabs of varying sizes and tints indicating that the
Shivling here has either been replaced by the cenotaph or is covered up by it.
17.
That after one enters the lofty arch from
the marble platform one-steps onto spacious halls which form a perambulatory
passage all around the central octagonal sanctum. That sanctum too has
entrances on all four sides. But only the south entrance has been kept open
since Shahjahan’s time. All these outer and inner entrances had silver doors,
which are common to all renowned Hindu (Vedic) shrines. Those were uprooted and
ranged on the outer marble plinth before being spirited away to Shahjahan’s
Mogul treasury. European visitors to the shrine around 1631 A.D. noticing the
uprooted costly fixtures such as silver doors ranged on the marble platform
misunderstood them to have been ordered by Shahjahan to be used in the building.
Contrarily the thousands of labourers rounded up from the by lanes of Agra city
under threats of dire consequences were forced to toil gratis to uproot all the
costly fixtures such as the gem studded gold railings (around the Shivaling),
silver doors, precious stones stuffed in the marble lattices and the golden
pitcher dripping water on the Shivlinga, and transport them to the mogul
treasury. Notice the framed decorative panels to the left and right of the
doorway. They depict embossed OM
shaped Dhatura flowers and conchshell- type foliage. The panel at the left has
the sacred conchshell design. The right side panel depicts a plant with flowers
shaped like the sacred Vedic chant (OM).
18.
That Mumtaz’s cenotaph in the foreground
and subsequent Shahjahan’s cenotaph besides it in the upper marble octagonal
chamber. Notice that both the cenotaphs are highly decorated with inlay work.
Science have been so somnolent for the last 350 and odd years as to allow the
preposterous Shahjahan and Mumtaz legend, stained with carnal love to pass muster in spite of being riddled with
a myriad loopholes disclosed .Around the hook
(from which hangs the chain) is a sketch in concentric circles. In the
smallest innermost circle are arrows symbolizing the eight surface directions.
Around it is another circle of 16 serpents looking down on the Shivling
underneath. Around it is a wider circle of 32 tridents. Surrounding it is a
bigger circle depicting 64 lotus buds. Even this mathematical progression of
multiples of 8 i.e. 8x2=16x2=32x2=64 is of esoteric Vedic significance and has
no relation with Islam.The preponderating significance of 8 in Vedic tradition
may be judged from terms such as Ashtapailu, Ashtavadhani, Ashtaputra,
Ashtadhatu, Ashtang Ayurved, Mangalashtak and Sastang namaskar.
19.
That the octagonal lattice around the
cenotaph of Mumtaz (which has replaced or covered the sacred Shivling) has in
its upper border a total of 108 pitchers, some rotund and striped and some
oblong like vases. The rotund striped pitcher is seen bathing the Shivaling
underneath with a stream of milk. The decorative flora on the vase and other
parts of the Taj Mahal alias Tejomahalaya is all native to India. Such
decoration in the orange, Vedic colour behooves a Hindu temple or palace but
never a somber Islamic sepulchre.
20.
That a close-up of the gilded pinnacle
rising from the inverted lotus cap of the marble dome .The pinnacle is known as
Kalash in Vedic parlance because of the stack of pitchers which constitute it.
The curvy shaft seen in the upper portion represents the crescent on Lord
Shiva’s forehead. Above it is an oblong pitcher, two mango leaves curving on
either side with a coconut balanced on top. Such a coconut –topped pitcher
represents divinity in Vedic tradition.
21.
That the three domes of the so-called mosque
are a misfit in Islam. Since Islam has only one Allah and one prophet for who
is the third dome? Moreover the qibla (i.e. the prayer niche) is not aligned to
the Kaba in Mecca, as it should be in a genuine mosque. Also when there are
three qiblas instead of one they couldn’t all be aligned to the Kaba at the
same time. And since the twin buildings on the eastern flank is a non-mosque it
automatically follows that its counterpart to the west is also a non-mosque.
Only buildings with the same function and purpose can have an identical design.
22.
That there is staircase and another
symmetrical one at the other end lead down to the storey beneath the marble
platform Tow such staircases (one each at the eastern and western ends) behind
the marble plinth take one to the nether chambers. Visitors may go to the back
of the marble plinth at the eastern or western end and descend down the
staircase because it is open to sky. But at the foot the archaeology department
has set up an iron grill door, which it keeps, locked. Yet one may peep inside
from the iron grill in the upper part of the door. Shahjahan had sealed even
these two staircases. It was the British who opened them. But from Shahjahan’s
time the stories below and above the marble ground floor have been barred to
visitors. We are still following Mogul dictates and Invader secrecy though long
free from Mogul Islamic rule.
23.
That One of the 22 locked rooms in the
secret storey beneath the marble platform of the Taj Mahal, which the
archaeological Survey of India keeps conspiratorially locked to hoodwink the
public. Therefore the public must pressurized the government to open all locked
and sealed chambers in all monuments including the Taj.
24.
That the strips of ancient Hindu
paint are seen on the wall flanking the doorway. The niches above had paintings
of Hindu gods, obviously rubbed off by Invader desecrators. One of the 22
riverside rooms in a secret storey of the Taj Mahal unknown to the public. Shahjahan
far from building the shining marble Taj wantonly disfigured it. Here he has
crudely walled up a doorway. Such imperial Mogul vandalism lies hidden from the
public. This room is in the red stone storey immediately below the marble
platform. Indian history has been turned topsy- in lauding destroyers as great
builders. Therefore Shahjahan should be referred to not as the creator of Taj
but as a plunderer of its costly fixtures and disfigurer of the sublime, serene
beauty of the holy Tejomahalaya.
25.
That many such doorways of
chambers in secret stories underneath the Taj Mahal have been sealed with brick
and lime. Concealed inside could be valuable evidence such as Sanskrit
inscriptions, Hindu idols, the original Hindu model of Taj, the desecrated
Shiva Linga, Hindu scriptures and temple equipment .The Government is
deliberately refraining from opening hundreds of such sealed chambers. Inside
the Taj Mahal for fear of enraging Invaders and exposing the incompetence of
historians worldwide.
26.
That there was the traditional
treasury well of the Hindu temple palace. Treasure chests used to be stacked in
the lower stories. Accountants, cashiers, and treasurers sat in the upper
stories. On being besieged if the building had to be surrendered to the enemy
the treasure chests used to be pushed into the water for salvage later after
recapture. For real research, water should be pumped out of this well to reveal
the evidence that lies at the bottom. This well is inside a tower near the socalled
mosque to the west of the marble Taj. Had the Taj been a mausoleum this
octagonal multi storied well would have been superfluous.
27.
That it has come to the notice
of the petitioner’s institute that there has been the digging of the place
where “gowshala” cow protection shelter was situated .It was revealed that
there are the remains of the temple dig inside the earth and the upper portion
of the temple called as “Amlak” was found to have been hidden inside there. The
official sought the instructions from the officials of the archaeological
department but the matter was subsided on the instructions of the authority as
it may annoy the fundamentalist as a result of which the appeasement policy
adopted by the government for getting the vote of the minority may be adversely
affected. Thus the spot inspections by appointing the team of survey
commissioner to submit Its report may kindly be ordered by this Hon’ble Court
28.
That Visitors to the Taj may notice the
letter “om” woven in bold relief in embossed
flower –designs on the interior marble walls. As one stands poised at the top
of the stairs leading to the basement (to se what they call the ‘real graves’)
one may see on the walls around the upper marble cenotaph chamber, at chest level,
the esoteric sacred Hindu letter ‘om’
woven into embossed marble flower pattern. Pink lotus patterns on the border of
the grilled panels that enclose the cenotaph may also be noticed.
29.
That a peacock Throne could never have
been ordered by fanatic mediaeval Invader rulers surrounded by even more
fanatic maulvis. Throughout their millennium long rule in India their one
penchant was to break images not to make them. The peacock Throne could only be
a piece of Hindu Palace furniture because traditionally a Hindu throne must
have the effigy of some bird or animal known for its splendor or valour. In
Hindu terminology the very term for a throne is a “Lion Seat (Simhasan).”Hardly
had the project begun, than we are told that by 1635 Shahjahan had amassed such
a plethora of gems and bullion, within seven years of his accession that he did
not know what to do with them. He therefore had a fabulous Peacock Throne
ordered.
30.
That According to Shahjahan’s court
chronicler (PP. 45-46,ibid.), it appears that the peacock Throne was “three
yards long, two and a half yards broad, yards high and set with jewels worth 86
lakh rupees. The canopy had 12 emerald columns. On top of each pillar were two
peacocks thick –set with rubies, diamonds, emeralds, and pearls. The throne
cost ten million Rupees.” “The marble screen enclosing an octagonal area in the
centre of the cenotaph chamber was, according to the Badshahnama placed here in
1642 by Shahjahan …According, however, to competent authority the screen was
placed here by Aurangzeb after he laid his father’s remains there.
31.
That “The basement rooms are
centrally situated as a line of 14 rooms along the face of the Great Basement,
under its terrace; and each of them is connected by a doorway with as inner
lobby running east and west along their entire length. From each end of the
lobby a staircase ascends to the terrace of the Great Basement, where its
entrance closed by red sandstone slabs, lay unsuspected until discovered a few
years ago, the clue being given by a small window overlooking the river in each
of the two easternmost rooms. The rooms, once frescoed and otherwise decorated
being now in darkness and infested by bats, cannot be explored without a torch
or lamp. Whether they originally opened on to a ghat and gave admittance to the
Taj from the river; or being provided with windows, were used as cool resorts
during the heat of the day, cannot now be decided”.
32.
That in the Agra Fort gallery, facing
the Taj, is a tiny glass piece embedded in the wall to mirror the Taj Mahal.
Originators of the Taj legend have conveniently annexed the device to add to
the mesmeric effect of the myth. Embedding tiny, round glass reflectors by
their thousands in arched recesses of palaces and in women’s dresses is a very
common and widespread Rajput practice. Such glass reflectors can still be seen
fixed in numerous ancient palaces in Rajasthan, and continue to be used for
decoration in Rajput women’s dresses. Saracenic architecture, if there be any
such should rather believe in “purdah “ i.e. shrouding or hiding and would
never think of glass reflectors. Mirror –pieces decorated the royal apartments
in Agra fort because it was a Hindu fort. Moreover Shahjahan was never
permitted access during interment to that part of the fort which overlooks the
Taj. It is, therefore absurd to argue that during detention he consoled himself
by catching glimpses of the Taj in the tiny glass piece.
33.
That a further absurdity and
inconsistency is; would an old monarch, bent with age, stand up all the time to
strain his bedimmed vision, and peer into a tiny glass piece with his back to
the Taj to catch a fleeting, reflected glimpse of the Taj when he could as well
have a clear, full, straight and direct view of it seated comfortably facing
the monument? And would not such a stance give him a pain in the neck? This is
yet another instance of how students of history, archaeologists and lay
visitors have never bothered or cared to take stock of the loose bits of the
Taj legend, and tried to rearrange them to find out whether they add up to at
least a coherent and cogent account, even if fictitious.
34.
That in addition to its sculptural
splendor, the Taj is also believed to have had gem studded marble screens, gold
railing, and silver doors. Readers can well add up to the cost of all these. It
will amount to a fabulous, astronomical sum. Perhaps even all the Mogul
emperors together could not have invested that much on a single monument. Had the Taj been an original tomb, Shahjahan
would never have allowed Indian flora to form the dominant feature of the
tapestry design inside the mausoleum of his wife. It is idle to argue that
because the workmen employed on the Taj happened to be Hindus their motifs got
incorporated in the Taj design. It must be remembered that it is the person who
pays the piper that calls the tune. Moreover when it is a question of the peace
of departed soul, symbols and motifs of a detested religion would never have
been allowed to be incorporated in the ornamental patterns of the Taj. In fact
the whole idea of having such a luxurious tomb built and having decorative
patterns made inside it is frowned upon in Islamic religion and tradition. But
Shahjahan had no alternative, but to put up with them, since he had taken over
a ready-made “heathen” monument.
35.
That under these circumstances, it
is expedient in the interest of justice that a facts finding committee may be
appointed for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department in respect
of their purported claim set-up regarding the historical blunder committed by
them in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other ancient
buildings as Muslim monuments and truth may be disclose to the public/citizens
and students of subject of history regarding their true authorship prior to
Mughal period in furtherance of their
fundamental rights conferred under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with 49
and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
36.
That it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court
May graciously be pleased to declare the provisions of The Ancient And
Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of
National Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the ancient and
historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal.
Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford, Ethmadualla and other Monuments built by Mugal
invaders on the basis of report submitted by The Governor General, Lord
Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme
of misusing the archaeological studies as ultravires to Article 19 (1) (a),
25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h) of constitution of India and may futher declare the
provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and
Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The
Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 of declaring these ancient building/
monuments preserved with such identity with out any scientific inquiry/
investigation as Muslim monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.
The true copy of THE ANCIENT MONUMENTS PRESERVATION ACT, 1904, The Ancient And
Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National
Importance) Act, 1951 and
The Ancient Monuments And
Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 ( Act No.24 of !958) and other
relevant Acts are filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.
19, 20 and 21
37.
That it is further prayed that on the
basis of the Research Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the
different books written by him as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1.
World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of
Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6.
Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building,
8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva
Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty,
Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN
2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the
truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the
General Citizen/ Students of history by conducting the research/ excavations of
the remains of Hindu monuments by the Central Government surroundings to all
such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments
as the incidents like demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be
repeated resulting in mass destruction of the public property shacking of
public confidence in Rule Of Law in the society. The true copy of the
representation submitted to the respondent No. 1 on the basis of the reserch
work conducted by Sri P. N. Oak having legal interpretation to the legal right
conffered to the citizen having scientific and analytcial approach regarding
Hindu authorship of monuments is filed as Annexure
No. 22
38.
That it is further prayed that A
writ , order, directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry
report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India to Declare
and Notify in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by
Shahalahan and thereby directing the Archaeological Survey of India to remove
the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting Shahjahan as
its creator to desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming / propagating and
teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop and discontinue
the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays or any other day in the week.
39.
That it is further prayed that a
writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India to open the locked-up
upper and lower portions of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal with numbers
of rooms, to remove all bricked up walls build later and look into room
therein, to investigate scientifically and certify which of those or both
cenotaphs are fake to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground
level, to look into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the
basement cenotaph-chamber. by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking
the doorway, to look for important historical evidence such as idols and
inscriptions hidden inside the Shahjahan’s orders.Recitiation of name in the west-flank
building be banned because that building is part of a temple complex.The water
in the 7 storeyed well, inside the tower near the so-called mosque, be drained
to for drained to look for historical evidence (such as Court jewels idols and
inscription jettisoned when Shahjahan’s troops stormed the premises to plunder
the Shiv Shrine).Free entry on Fridays should be discontinued to prevent loss
of revenue to the Government .If free entry on Friday is allowed to continue
then free entry on Mondays should be ordered because Mondays are Shiv worship
days.
No comments:
Post a Comment